top of page
Search


LATE DELIVERY OF VACANT POSSESSION DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC & MCO LOCKDOWN
The Malaysia's Covid-19 Act provides an automatic extension of time of 167 days which excludes the period (18th of March 2020 until the 31st


30 HOMEBUYERS WIN RM1.7 MILLION IN LAD CLAIM AGAINST DEVELOPER
On the 15th of May 2023, High Court Judge YA Tee Geok Hock decided the following pertaining to 30 homebuyer's claims for LAD.


13 HOMEBUYERS WIN RM610K IN LAD CLAIM AGAINST DEVELOPER
The SPAs were modified by the Developer, extending the delivery of vacant possession from the standard 36 months.


92 HOMEBUYERS SUCCEEDED IN RM3.6 MILLION LAD CLAIM AGAINST DEVELOPER
In the case of Ng Sook Foon v Marimo Land Sdn Bhd [2022] MLJU 2061 ("Marimo Land")


TRIBUNAL FOR HOMEBUYER CLAIMS MALAYSIA
The Tribunal For Home Buyer’s Claim (Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah) is an option to homebuyers to resolve their disputes.


SCHEDULE H PROJECTS SHALL BE DELIVERED WITHIN 36 MONTHS
Schedule H is a statutory agreement wherein developer receives the payment according to stages of completion.


SUCCESSFUL MALAYSIA LIQUIDATED ASCERTAINED DAMAGES (LAD) CASES IN FAVOUR OF HOMEBUYERS
Cases wherein purchasers were successful in their pursuit of Liquidated Ascertained Damages LAD for late delivery of vacant possession


THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS IN MALAYSIA
The Hierarchy of Courts in Malaysia. Malaysian Judiciary System. Magistrates' Court, Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and the Fed
![CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.webp)
![CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/722340_ce90767cc7bc4ca59a6108696e56412c~mv2.webp)
CASE COMMENTARY: PJD REGENCY SDN BHD v LEE KOK SENG & ORS [2022] MLJU 2282
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 4


“ANG MING LEE NOT TO BE DISTINGUISHED! PURCHASER’S 36-MONTH STATUTORY CLAIM FOR LAD VALID” SAYS COA
Court of Appeal in Prema Bonanza Sdn Bhd v Lam Su See [Civil Appeals No.: W-02(IM)(NCvC)-624-03/2021 & W-02(IM)(NCvC)-625-03/2021]


ANG MING LEE AND PJD REGENCY PREVAILS! – ZOOMING INTO THE DECISION OF CHIN YONGQIN
On 06.06.2021, the High Court vide a Judgment delivered by Ahmad Murad Abdul Aziz JC in Chin Yongqin v Prosper Plus Industry Sdn Bhd [2021]


NO RESTRAINTS ON HOMEBUYERS’ RIGHTFUL CLAIM FOR LAD!
Lui & Bhullar’s Housing Development Miniseries Episode 1


IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES OF HDA AND NON-HDA PROPERTIES
In Malaysia, residential properties are sold under two types of contracts.


THE FEDERAL COURT SAYS THE CALCULATION FOR LAD BEGINS FROM BOOKING FEE DATE!
Vide the grounds of judgment of PJD Regency Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor and other appeals, the Federal Court


STARTING DATE FOR CALCULATION OF LIQUIDATED ASCERTAINED DAMAGES
The Court of Appeal decision of Sri Damansara Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Ors [2020] 1 LNS 1090 (“Sri Damansara”) faced two
bottom of page
